Login / Register

User Name
Password

Search



Advanced Search

Advertisers

  #41  
Old 11-08-2008, 03:37 PM
jimbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Age: 36
Posts: 3,229
jimbo has a reputation beyond reputejimbo has a reputation beyond reputejimbo has a reputation beyond reputejimbo has a reputation beyond reputejimbo has a reputation beyond reputejimbo has a reputation beyond reputejimbo has a reputation beyond reputejimbo has a reputation beyond reputejimbo has a reputation beyond reputejimbo has a reputation beyond reputejimbo has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to jimbo
Climber07

I beat you to that one in the last thread where we discussed this
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-08-2008, 03:40 PM
climber07's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mid-Levels, Hong Kong
Age: 30
Posts: 685
climber07 has a brilliant futureclimber07 has a brilliant futureclimber07 has a brilliant futureclimber07 has a brilliant futureclimber07 has a brilliant futureclimber07 has a brilliant futureclimber07 has a brilliant futureclimber07 has a brilliant futureclimber07 has a brilliant futureclimber07 has a brilliant futureclimber07 has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimbo View Post
Climber07

I beat you to that one in the last thread where we discussed this
My bad Jimbo...haven't been around here in a while! It's still applicable though
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-08-2008, 03:45 PM
DanielandHayley's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Park Island
Posts: 628
DanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond repute
I did laugh. alot! Normally I would react to being trodden on (because i'm a grumpy, arsey git) but in this case it was definately worth it!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-08-2008, 03:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 323
shilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant future
[quote=Claire ex-ax;237275]MTR ticket: $7.20
QUOTE]

In a nutshell, isn't that the biggest difference between the MTR and the London Underground, especially if you travel in London during the week before 9:30 am? I don't even know how much a peak fare is during the week in London these days but I am sure I can travel to work and back each day in HK for one whole week for the price of a one day ticket on the London Underground.

Sure people barge a bit on the MTR but it's kind of fun and for HKD 7.20 it's something I can put up with.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-08-2008, 03:58 PM
jonnye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wanchai, HK
Age: 33
Posts: 201
jonnye has a brilliant futurejonnye has a brilliant futurejonnye has a brilliant futurejonnye has a brilliant futurejonnye has a brilliant futurejonnye has a brilliant futurejonnye has a brilliant futurejonnye has a brilliant futurejonnye has a brilliant futurejonnye has a brilliant futurejonnye has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to jonnye Send a message via MSN to jonnye Send a message via Skype™ to jonnye
Quote:
Originally Posted by shilo507 View Post
In a nutshell, isn't that the biggest difference between the MTR and the London Underground,
I'd have to disagree that the biggest difference is the cost. The London Underground is considerably more extensive than the MTR. If it had been designed/installed in the 70s I think it would be a very different system and service a much smaller area. The number of lines, stations, and trains that run in London is probably more than any other city (certainly all the cities that run an underground/metro system I've been to).

It's obviously not helped that some of the infrastructure dates back to the Victorian age. It's inefficient, archaic, underfunded, and idiosyncratic - but despite all that I think it's pretty brilliant (or maybe it's because of all that). Who in their right mind would build underground stations today that might only be a few hundred yards apart? And have them look considerably further apart on the map!

Any system that has a station called Mornington Crescent gets my vote.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-08-2008, 04:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 155
imparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud of
alternatively, its possible that you can move to an area near the east rail amd within the new territories and having a choice of travelling first class ( with proper padded seats) assuming your journey is to kowloon (kowloon tong, mong kok, hung hom and east tsim sha tsui)

thus, solving your problem over severe over-crowding (its not as bad on the eastern line as the tsuen wan line) as well as you have a very high chance of seat on first class.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-08-2008, 04:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 155
imparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud of
pls also remember, it used to be even worse more than 10 years ago on the MTR, you have staff whose job is to push ( yes, to ram more people on the trains) more people on to the trains as well as less lines (no tung chung line, west line, tseung kwan line or ma on shan line) as well as no saftey barriers!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-08-2008, 04:24 PM
DanielandHayley's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Park Island
Posts: 628
DanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond reputeDanielandHayley has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by imparanoic View Post
pls also remember, it used to be even worse more than 10 years ago on the MTR, you have staff whose job is to push ( yes, to ram more people on the trains) more people on to the trains as well as less lines (no tung chung line, west line, tseung kwan line or ma on shan line) as well as no saftey barriers!!!!
what happened if you pushed back??
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-08-2008, 04:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 155
imparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud ofimparanoic has much to be proud of
if you pushed back a MTR staff, then would possibly call the police and you could get done for assualt!!

apparently,( according to the scmp) there is a former KCRC bylaw which allows offenders possibly to be jailed for 3 months just for verbal abuse!!

in uk, you have to severely hospitalise someone to get a similar punishment by the courts.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-08-2008, 04:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 323
shilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant futureshilo507 has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnye View Post
I'd have to disagree that the biggest difference is the cost. The London Underground is considerably more extensive than the MTR.
I cannot agree on the cost issue. All forms of public transport in the UK (especially in London) are over-priced and often appalling.

I agree that the LU is considerably more extensive than the MTR except of course if you live south of the river. If you are coming in from the south London suburbs you often have to take a bus or an overland train (or drive) to get to the Tube Station. This increases commuting costs considerably.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 11:32 AM.