Login / Register

User Name
Password

Search



Advanced Search

Advertisers

  #1  
Old 30-07-2008, 11:09 PM
pin's Avatar
pin pin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 833
pin has much to be proud ofpin has much to be proud ofpin has much to be proud ofpin has much to be proud ofpin has much to be proud ofpin has much to be proud ofpin has much to be proud ofpin has much to be proud ofpin has much to be proud of
so no free internet access during the olympics

seems the chinese government have gone back on the their promise for free internet access:

AFP: China to censor Internet during Olympics: organisers

IOC knew about internet restrictions | The Australian

and many other news sources.

Last edited by pin; 30-07-2008 at 11:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-07-2008, 01:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fo Tan
Posts: 1,685
Sleuth has much to be proud ofSleuth has much to be proud ofSleuth has much to be proud ofSleuth has much to be proud ofSleuth has much to be proud ofSleuth has much to be proud ofSleuth has much to be proud ofSleuth has much to be proud ofSleuth has much to be proud ofSleuth has much to be proud of
Did you really expect a different outcome?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-07-2008, 01:21 PM
Claire ex-ax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 895
Claire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond repute
Actually I think this is the IOC's fault for "misleading" journalists and the rest of the world. Clearly the IOC knew that China would not allow free Internet access during the Games. Perhaps it thought China could be talked around. Or perhaps the IOC is a corrupt bunch of wan... people who go where the money is.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-07-2008, 01:30 PM
hullexile's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Heng Fa Chuen
Age: 51
Posts: 1,546
hullexile has a reputation beyond reputehullexile has a reputation beyond reputehullexile has a reputation beyond reputehullexile has a reputation beyond reputehullexile has a reputation beyond reputehullexile has a reputation beyond reputehullexile has a reputation beyond reputehullexile has a reputation beyond reputehullexile has a reputation beyond reputehullexile has a reputation beyond reputehullexile has a reputation beyond repute
Actually think it is a bit of a storm about nothing. If the foreign journalists desperately want to see something on the internet can't they just get someone back home to copy it and send it by email? Any journalist who really believed there was going to be free internet access in China should not be in the job!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-07-2008, 02:24 PM
er2 er2 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 270
er2 has a reputation beyond reputeer2 has a reputation beyond reputeer2 has a reputation beyond reputeer2 has a reputation beyond reputeer2 has a reputation beyond reputeer2 has a reputation beyond reputeer2 has a reputation beyond reputeer2 has a reputation beyond reputeer2 has a reputation beyond reputeer2 has a reputation beyond reputeer2 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by hullexile View Post
Actually think it is a bit of a storm about nothing. If the foreign journalists desperately want to see something on the internet can't they just get someone back home to copy it and send it by email? Any journalist who really believed there was going to be free internet access in China should not be in the job!
I don't think that is the point here. Those journalists certainly all have IPSec VPNs to their home servers. The point is more that this is a very blatant breach of what was promised - ok, not that the other ones were very subtle.

I'd say the media frenzy about this is more because this is a pretty offensive move of the Chinese Government, and it is totally pointless at the same time (as if the Bocog would care whether an Italian journalist could reach a Falun Gong website directly or via his VPN gateway in Milan). It is a message - "yes, we're breaking the promises we gave and we don't give a shit. And noone else does either. We don't even need a reason! So back off!"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-08-2008, 04:19 PM
Claire ex-ax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 895
Claire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond reputeClaire ex-ax has a reputation beyond repute
From RTHK:

Quote:
The International Olympic Committee and the Chinese organisers have agreed to lift all Internet restrictions for the Beijing Games. IOC vice-president Gunilla Lindberg told Reuters that BOCOG had agreed to lift bans on websites such as Amnesty International, following a meeting last night. This latest development comes after the IOC denied ever doing a deal with Mainland authorities to censor the internet during the Games.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-08-2008, 04:36 PM
Lammarite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Not friggin' Lamma no more!
Posts: 1,961
Lammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond repute
The IOC deserves all they are getting- they went into this with their eyes wide open.
BOCOG knows that the IOC ARen't going to pull the plug on the whole thing thsi late in the game so why not do what they want? I'm sure this is only the beginning.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2008, 04:50 PM
Crocodile's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sai Wan Ho
Posts: 465
Crocodile has a reputation beyond reputeCrocodile has a reputation beyond reputeCrocodile has a reputation beyond reputeCrocodile has a reputation beyond reputeCrocodile has a reputation beyond reputeCrocodile has a reputation beyond reputeCrocodile has a reputation beyond reputeCrocodile has a reputation beyond reputeCrocodile has a reputation beyond reputeCrocodile has a reputation beyond reputeCrocodile has a reputation beyond repute
The two are as bad as each other. One is full over over-paid back-slappers who don't really report to anyone, do all their work mysteriously behind closed doors and take "incentives" and other junkets regularly. The other is the Chinese Government Officials.

The hold that the IOC have over the word "Olympic" and "Games" make China look not-so-strict on rules. Actually, not even sure I can use them in the same sentence without paying a royalty.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-08-2008, 05:20 PM
Lammarite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Not friggin' Lamma no more!
Posts: 1,961
Lammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond reputeLammarite has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crocodile View Post
The hold that the IOC have over the word "Olympic" and "Games" make China look not-so-strict on rules. Actually, not even sure I can use them in the same sentence without paying a royalty.
At least you didn't show a picture of the Olympic rings. Every time you do they kill a kitten.






Last edited by Lammarite; 01-08-2008 at 05:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2008, 05:27 PM
sylvesterjay's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 1,133
sylvesterjay has a reputation beyond reputesylvesterjay has a reputation beyond reputesylvesterjay has a reputation beyond reputesylvesterjay has a reputation beyond reputesylvesterjay has a reputation beyond reputesylvesterjay has a reputation beyond reputesylvesterjay has a reputation beyond reputesylvesterjay has a reputation beyond reputesylvesterjay has a reputation beyond reputesylvesterjay has a reputation beyond reputesylvesterjay has a reputation beyond repute
For a government that is eager to showcase themselves on the world stage, they are doing a pretty poor job. Then again, they seem to think the way they do things should be exported to other countries...case in point their handling of the torch run thru other countries
Reply With Quote
Reply
Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Olympics in Sha Tin Everything Else
Olympics - The Rules Beijing Olympics Forum
End of Olympics? Beijing Olympics Forum
Free wireless Internet Access in cafes? Everything Else
Calls the US free (internet phone) Technology & Gadgets


Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT +8. The time now is 11:15 AM.