View Single Post
  #6  
Old 24-11-2006, 05:38 PM
PDLM's Avatar
PDLM PDLM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 7,601
PDLM has a reputation beyond reputePDLM has a reputation beyond reputePDLM has a reputation beyond reputePDLM has a reputation beyond reputePDLM has a reputation beyond reputePDLM has a reputation beyond reputePDLM has a reputation beyond reputePDLM has a reputation beyond reputePDLM has a reputation beyond reputePDLM has a reputation beyond reputePDLM has a reputation beyond repute
If you get salary of 25K and housing allowance (of whatever amount) which is spent entirely on housing then your salary for tax purposes is 27.5K (25K+10%). See http://www.ird.gov.hk/eng/pdf/pam44e.pdf for details.

Scenario 2 your salary for tax purposes is 40K.

I used flat rate tax (17%) to come up with the difference between the two, but in fact you aren't earning enough to be on flat rate tax, which makes the two scenarios a bit closer.

Doing the calculation using the tax calculator here: http://www.ird.gov.hk/eng/ese/ind_stc.htm
Tax on 27.5K (320K/year) is 31.3K.
Tax on 40K (480K/year) is 61.7K

Cash in hand after rent:
Scenario 1: 320K - 31.3K = 288.7K
Scenario 2: 480K - 120K - 61.7K = 298.3K

So you are 10K per year better off in Scenario 2.

Of course, if your rent (and housing allowance) was 11K or more without any change in salary then you'd be better off under Scenario 1.
Reply With Quote